Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Bartlett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 3, 1928No. 17935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. The compensation payable under the workmen’s compensation act is in the nature of compensation for pecuniary loss sustained by the claimant resulting from the death of a person who in a pecuniary way applies his labor and services to the support of the claimant; and since such pecuniary loss results from the death of the person upon whom the claimant is dependent for pecuniary contributions, there is no substantial difference, under the compensation act, between a claim for “compensation” and one for damages for “lost services.” One is ‘tweedledum and the other is tweedledee. A claim filed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Austin Bros. Bridge Co. v. WhitmireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. Travelers Insurance Co. v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API