Legal Opinion

Edmunds v. Barrow

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 8, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Prince Edward county in an action of ejectment. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

The question in controversy in this case, which is an action of ejectment, is the true location of the southern boundary line of a 86-acre parcel of land, designated as lot No. 2 in the partition of a large tract of land known as the Hurd land, lying in Prince Edward county, and near, but outside the limits of, the town of Farmville.

In the plat and survey of the county surveyor who ran the lines by which the partition was made, and which are made a part of the deed of partition, the 86-acre tract is described as follows: “Lot north of house lot contains 86 acres. Line commencing at rock on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reusens v. LawsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. State Savings Bank v. StewartSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  3. Fry v. StowersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burdette v. BRUSH MOUNTAIN ESTATES, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  2. Mathews v. GillespieSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  3. Honaker v. ShraderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
  4. Smith v. BaileySupreme Court of Virginia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API