Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hanover 3201 Realty, LLC v. Village Supermarkets, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 12, 2015No. 14-4183Published

1DissentGreenberg, Circuit Judge

I concur with and join in Sections I, the background section, and II.A.', the antitrust standing section, of Judge Fuentes’s opinion. Thus, I agree with his conclusion in Section II.A. that plaintiff, Hanover 3201 Realty, LLC (“3201 Realty”), has antitrust standing in the full-service supermarket market but not in the full-service supermarket rental space market. I cannot agree, however, with Judge Fuentes’s opinion to the extent that I believe it expands the sham exception to Noerr-Pen-nington immunity. I decline to join in this aspect of Judge Fuentes’s opinion because: (1) 3201 Realty has…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Mark D. Tourscher v. Martin Horn, Secretary of the Pa. Dept. Of Corrections John McCullough Superintendent ,(d.c. Civil No. 98-Cv-00176j)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API