Legal Opinion

Jones v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 26, 1990No. 1—90—0152PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE LaPORTA

delivered the opinion of the court:

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly suffered by plaintiff as a result of the negligent conduct of defendant, Chicago Transit Authority (CTA). The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant and plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff, Mary Walker Jones, brought an action seeking damages for personal injuries allegedly suffered on December 3, 1987, as a result of the negligent conduct of defendant. On June 1, 1988, plaintiff filed her complaint which asserted that she was injured when…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rowe v. State Bank of LombardIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Lance v. SeniorIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Fancil v. Q.S.E. Foods, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Curtis v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Barnes v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Krywin v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Maschhoff v. National Super Markets, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Rowe v. State Bank of LombardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Krywin v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Krywin v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API