Legal Opinion

L.d.m. Worldwide Corp., Resp. v. Richard Erog, Apps.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 3, 2014No. 67404-8Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON L.D.M. WORLDWIDE CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, No. 67404-8-1 Respondent DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION METIN DALMAN; SIMURG MEDIA, an alter ego of Metin Dalman, jointly, severally, and individually as partners in fact and implied in law, Defendants, RICHARD EROG; and BROADCAST r-o o C=> FACILITY, an unincorporated alter ego of x- -—*CT. -»=3 Richard Erog jointly, severally, and -n m 1 'o individually as partners in fact and implied rn ~T^ i in law, CO V~T ~T Appellant. FILED: February 3, 2014 5 |> 9? '•-••u' en o"-^ Appelwick, J. —…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Boschetto v. HansingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Compuserve, Incorporated v. Richard S. Patterson, Individually, and Flashpoint DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Mitchell B. Haisten, Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of Jean E. Haisten v. Grass Valley Medical Reimbursement Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Shute v. Carnival Cruise LinesWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Burrell v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API