In re McLoughlin

OPINION OF THE COURT

The respondent was served with a petition containing one *10charge of professional misconduct. In his answer, the respondent admitted the factual allegations contained in the petition, but denied that he was guilty of any professional misconduct. After a hearing, the Special Referee failed to sustain the charge. The Grievance Committee now moves to disaffirm the Special Referee’s report, and the respondent cross-moves to confirm it.

Charge One alleged that the respondent engaged in illegal, corrupt, and unethical conduct; conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice;…