Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 28, 1995No. A95A1284PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

Eddie Smith was convicted of possession of cocaine following a jury trial. Smith’s motion for new trial was denied, and he appeals.

1. The trial court’s charge to the jury made it abundantly clear that it was the State’s burden to prove Smith guilty beyond a reasonable doubt as to each and every element of the offense charged. Accordingly, Smith’s attempt to show that the use of the phrase “moral and reasonable certainty” within that charge constituted reversible error is controlled adversely to him by the holding of the Supreme Court in Burgess v. State, 264 Ga. 777, 787 (28)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Burgess v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. Baldwin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  5. Schwerdtfeger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  2. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Barber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. D'ANGELO v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API