Legal Opinion

Czar, Inc. v. Heath

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 18, 2009No. A-114 September Term 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

966 A.2d 1008 (2009)

198 N.J. 195

CZAR, INC., a New Jersey Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Jo Anne HEATH and Thomas J. Heath, Sr., Defendants-Respondents.

A-114 September Term 2007.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 20, 2008.

Decided March 18, 2009.

Matthew T. Priore, Montvale, argued the cause for appellant, (Mr. Priore, attorney; Mr. Priore and Robert A. Vort, Hackensack, on the briefs).

James C. DeZao, III, Parsippany, argued the cause for respondents.

2Opinion of the Court · HoensJustice Hoens

This appeal presents us with a novel question about the scope and application of the Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -20.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Gennari v. Weichert Co. RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  4. Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  5. Thiedemann v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API