Czar, Inc. v. Heath
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court 1
966 A.2d 1008 (2009)
198 N.J. 195
CZAR, INC., a New Jersey Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jo Anne HEATH and Thomas J. Heath, Sr., Defendants-Respondents.
A-114 September Term 2007.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued October 20, 2008.
Decided March 18, 2009.
Matthew T. Priore, Montvale, argued the cause for appellant, (Mr. Priore, attorney; Mr. Priore and Robert A. Vort, Hackensack, on the briefs).
James C. DeZao, III, Parsippany, argued the cause for respondents.
2Opinion of the Court · HoensJustice Hoens
This appeal presents us with a novel question about the scope and application of the Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -20.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited38 opinions
- Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Gennari v. Weichert Co. RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- Thiedemann v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.