Landry v. Landry
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
REDMANN, Judge.
A father appeals from a judgment condemning him to pay $350 monthly alimony for his five children. He had sought to pay only $225.
There is no transcript of testimony, nor, as provided by C.C.P. 2131, narrative of facts by counsel nor motion by counsel for narrative by the trial judge. We are therefore unable to decide the correctness of the judgment. See So-Cam, Inc. v. Atkins, La. App.1966, 189 So.2d 742, writ refused, 249 La. 765, 191 So.2d 142.
The appeal is dismissed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- So-Cam, Inc. v. AtkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- So-Cam, Inc. v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hanley v. HanleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Ernest Joubert Co. v. TatumLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Richardson v. HeydLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975