Legal Opinion

People v. Thornton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1990No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: A few months before entry of a guilty plea, defendant applied for the substitution of assigned counsel. Upon inquiry by the court, defendant stated that counsel was not acting in his "best interests”. Although offered the opportunity to elaborate upon his request, defendant simply stated that he wanted a new lawyer. That general statement professing a lack of confidence in assigned counsel did not amount to good cause for substitution of counsel, and the court’s inquiry, in the circumstances of this case, was sufficient to protect defendant’s right…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. SawyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. DixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. People v. GensickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. People v. FearsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. ThorntonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API