Legal Opinion
Dymond v. Dunn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 29, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mercure, J.
Plaintiffs, Frank E. Dymond and Eleanor L. Dymond, commenced this action to recover for property damage and personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident between Frank and defendant David A. Dunn. Plaintiffs’ claim against defendants Raymond Crofts and Kathleen Crofts was based upon Dram Shop Act liability, as it was alleged that Dunn was drinking at their tavern before the accident. Frank sought recovery against the Crofts for medical expenses, loss of earnings, property loss, and conscious pain and suffering, and Eleanor sought recovery for loss of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JackoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Kozlowski v. Briggs Leasing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1978
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Stuyvesant InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Celona v. Royal Globe InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Firemen's Insurance v. BowleyNew York Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by5 opinions
- Musgrove v. American Protection InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- GRINAGE, MILTON v. DURAWA, DIANEAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- General Accident Insurance v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Grinage v. DurawaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Grinage v. DurawaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016