Legal Opinion

N. Valley Mall, LLC v. Longs Drug Store S Cal., LLC

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided September 25, 2018No. C079281Published

1Opinion of the CourtBlease, Acting P.J.

*600At issue in this case is whether the court should "go behind" the form of a corporate reorganization in order to alter contractual obligations, when the corporation utilized the type of reorganization it used in order to avoid altering its contractual obligations. The type of reorganization used in this case is a common one, and is referred to as a reverse triangular merger.1 The usefulness of such a merger is to leave the target corporation intact as a subsidiary of the acquiring corporation where the target corporation has contracts or assets that are not easily assignable.

We conclude that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In Re McKesson HBOC, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
  3. In Re AlbertoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Ser-Bye Corp. v. C. P. & G. Markets, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Phillips v. Cooper Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API