Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schillawski v. State of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1961No. Claim 32769; Claim 32760Published

1Dissent

Fboessel, J. (dissenting).

I dissent and vote to reverse. Except as to an admitted 450-square-foot encroachment, for which no damages were allowed, the Court of Claims held that the State acquired a 6-rod, or 99-foot, right of way simply because the statute authorized the Turnpike Company (a private corporation for private gain [Matter of Rochester Elec. Ry. Co., 123 N. Y. 351, 356-357]) to lay out a road of that width. This position strikes me as completely untenable, since the same statute required the company to purchase or condemn needed land, where it was necessary to deviate from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. . CaywoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. In Re Rochester Electric Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Marvin v. PardeeNew York Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Gucker v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API