Schillawski v. State of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Fboessel, J. (dissenting).
I dissent and vote to reverse. Except as to an admitted 450-square-foot encroachment, for which no damages were allowed, the Court of Claims held that the State acquired a 6-rod, or 99-foot, right of way simply because the statute authorized the Turnpike Company (a private corporation for private gain [Matter of Rochester Elec. Ry. Co., 123 N. Y. 351, 356-357]) to lay out a road of that width. This position strikes me as completely untenable, since the same statute required the company to purchase or condemn needed land, where it was necessary to deviate from the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Walker v. . CaywoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- In Re Rochester Electric Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Marvin v. PardeeNew York Supreme Court · 1872
- Gucker v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914