Legal Opinion

In re Henderson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 26, 2000No. 99-B-3593PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.*

This attorney disciplinary proceeding arises from seven counts.of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Edward L. Henderson, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Louisiana.

UNDERLYING FACTS

The Rendina Matter

Dr. Robert C. Rendina, a Ruston, Louisiana chiropractor, treated many of respondent’s clients in connection with personal injury cases. In late 1994 and early 1995, respondent reached settlements in the cases of four such clients, and retained funds from these settlements to pay Dr.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. La. State Bar Ass'n v. HinrichsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  3. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. GuidrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  4. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ChatelainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  5. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. KrasnoffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re GrahamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  2. In re HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  3. In re HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API