Legal Opinion · Dissent

Choban v. Washington County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 3, 1993No. 90-113; CA A80768Published

1DissentEdmonds, J.

The majority relies on East McAndrews Neighborhood v. City of Medford, 104 Or App 280, 800 P2d 308 (1990), rev den 311 Or 150 (1991), as authority for rejecting respondents’ argument that the failure of petitioner to serve them by registered or certified mail is a jurisdictional defect. In that case, the respondent moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that it did not show proof of service on LUBA. We held that the failure to serve LUBA was not a jurisdictional defect under ORS 197.850(3)(b), which provides:

*218“Filing of the petition as set forth in paragraph (a) of this subsection, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stroh v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Multnomah County v. LuihnOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Zurich Insurance v. Diversified Risk ManagementOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. East McAndrews Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API