Legal Opinion

State v. Armendarez

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1992No. 18080PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANSOM, Chief Justice.

Joe Armendarez appeals from his conviction of first-degree murder. NMSA 1978, § 30-2-1(A) (Repl.Pamp.1984). He argues first that the State created error by successfully seeking an instruction, inconsistent with the defense theory presented, on the lesser included offense of second-degree murder, and then, in closing, arguing to the jury that it could not possibly find defendant guilty of the lesser offense. Next he contends that other comments made by the State during closing argument were misstatements of the law and the evidence, and thus were improper.

Facts. On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Folz v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. ChamberlainNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. VenegasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. ComptonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. BenallyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. FryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. FryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API