Legal Opinion
Cravatt v. Thomas
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided August 22, 1975No. 74-C-235, 74-C-427, 74-C-443, 75-C-38 and 75-C-39PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES E. DOYLE, District Judge.
These are petitions for writs of habeas corpus by inmates confined at the Federal Correctional Institution at Oxford, Wisconsin, in this district. In each proceeding, the respondent or respondents have opposed the petition on the ground, among others, that the petitioner has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. I have consolidated these petitions for the purpose of addressing this single issue common to each. The status of each case with respect to this issue is as follows:
74-C-235
Petitioner Cravatt alleges that he is presently…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wickham v. FisherUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Hensley v. EndicottWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Preece v. HouseUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Khaled A. Qasem v. C.E. KozarekCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Brown v. CarlsonDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.