Legal Opinion

Grimditch v. Grimditch

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1951No. 5161PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

On motion for rehearing the appellant has called the court’s attention to the fact 'that it failed to rule upon his assignment of error' No. VII. In that assignment he ■charged that the trial court abused its discretion and therefore erred in imposing an onerous restriction upon him in its granting to him the right to the custody of his children during a portion of each year. Specif ically the portion of the judgment of which complaint is made requires him to execute and post a continuing bond fixed by the court in the sum of $25,000 conditioned that defendant would safely return his minor…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Spector v. SpectorArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hatch v. HatchArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Stonham v. WidiastutiWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Badertscher v. BadertscherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Woodford v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API