Legal Opinion

Burrill v. Crossman

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 21, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Admiralty. On motion for leave to amend answer.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, District Judge.

This action was brought in 1894, by the owners of the bark Kate Burrill, against the charterers thereof, to recover 53 days’ allowance of demurrage for detention of the bark in the port of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in September, October, and November, 1893. The bark was chartered in March, 1893, to carry a load of lumber to Rio. On the voyage out she lost a portion of the cargo by perils of the sea, and delivered the remainder during the said months. The answer to the libel, after some general denials, set-up affirmatively, in the fourth article, that, under a cesser of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crossman v. BurrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Burrill v. CrossmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
  3. Burrill v. CrossmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1894
  4. Burrill v. CrossmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burrill v. CrossmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API