Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ex Parte Hopson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 17, 1985No. 69310Published

1ConcurrenceClinton, Judge

During the course of determining whether the plea of guilty by applicant was made freely, voluntarily and intelligently, the trial judge inquired of him:

“Q. And have you discussed also with [your attorney] Mr. Holbrook and has he explained to you that the court, in return for your plea, is not going to find that there was a deadly weapon used in either one of these cases?” 1

A. Yes, sir.

Q. So that you will be given the benefit of that ommission [sic] in crediting your time served in the penitentiary; do you understand that?

A. Yes, sir.”

Nevertheless, as the opinion of the Court points out, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. McNew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. Smith v. BlackwellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Garcia v. LaughlinTexas Supreme Court · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API