Legal Opinion

Twiman v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1933No. 12571PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLemert, J.

There are really only two issues raised by plaintiff in error in oral argument and in brief:

First: Did the trial court err in failing to charge the jury upon the law of self defense.

Second: Whether the trial court erred in failing to charge upon intent to kill in connection with the following charge:

“If you find, after careful and deliberate consideration of all the evidence that Samuel Seabrock came to his death by a gun shot fired by the defendant and that sucli *460shot was fired by James Twiman purposely and with deliberate and premeditated malice, then it will be your duty to render a…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. EsherickOhio Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API