Legal Opinion
Twiman v. State
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 16, 1933No. 12571PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtLemert, J.
There are really only two issues raised by plaintiff in error in oral argument and in brief:
First: Did the trial court err in failing to charge the jury upon the law of self defense.
Second: Whether the trial court erred in failing to charge upon intent to kill in connection with the following charge:
“If you find, after careful and deliberate consideration of all the evidence that Samuel Seabrock came to his death by a gun shot fired by the defendant and that sucli *460shot was fired by James Twiman purposely and with deliberate and premeditated malice, then it will be your duty to render a…
2Cited by1 opinion
- State v. EsherickOhio Court of Appeals · 1969