Pontes v. Calmar Steamship Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Per curiam
ORDER SUR PLAINTIFF’S PETITION (Document 9) FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER OF 6/17/66 GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO TRANSFER (Document 7)
And now, July 12, 1966, after consideration of PLAINTIFF’S PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Document 9) and the record, it is ordered that plaintiff’s petition for reconsideration is denied.
' The above Petition is inaccurate in stating that Judge Van Dusen “stated that the present case was being transferred to the District of Maryland in view of the less crowded docket in the transferee jurisdiction.” The partial transcript containing the statements of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- All States Freight, Inc. v. ModarelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Jurgelis v. Southern Motors Express, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
- Newfield v. Nicholson File Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blender v. SibleyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Thomas v. Silver Creek Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Cassady v. American Commercial Barge Line Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1970