Legal Opinion

Lacy v. Pixler

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 19, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Andrew Circuit Court. — IIoit. C. A. Anthony, Judgo. (1) Plaintiffs’ motion to strike out defendants’ answer should have been sustained. Schenck v. Stump, 6 Mo. App. 381; Mueller v. Kcessman, 84 Mo. 318; Carpenter v. Carpenter, 45 Ind. 142; Iluth v. Co., 56 Mo. 202; Thomas v. Pullis, 56 Mo. 211; Peterson v. LaiJc, 24 Mo. 541; Simms v. Kverhardt, 102 U. S. 312; Wells v. Seixas, 24 Fed. Rep. (N. Y.) 82; 1 Pars, on Cont. 317; 2 Kent’s Com. [12 Eel.], 241; Keenv.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Andrew Circuit Court. — IIoit. C. A. Anthony, Judgo. (1) Plaintiffs’ motion to strike out defendants’ answer should have been sustained. Schenck v. Stump, 6 Mo. App. 381; Mueller v. Kcessman, 84 Mo. 318; Carpenter v. Carpenter, 45 Ind. 142; Iluth v. Co., 56 Mo. 202; Thomas v. Pullis, 56 Mo. 211; Peterson v. LaiJc, 24 Mo. 541; Simms v. Kverhardt, 102 U. S. 312; Wells v. Seixas, 24 Fed. Rep. (N. Y.) 82; 1 Pars, on Cont. 317; 2 Kent’s Com. [12 Eel.], 241; Keenv. Coleman, 39 Penn. 299; Price v. Jennings, 62 Inch 111; Wirland v. Kobick, 110 111. 16; Baker v. Stone, 136 Mass. 405;…

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, P. J.

This was an action of ejectment brought by Thomas L. Lacy and his wife, to recover eighty or ninety acres of land. Thomas W. Lacy died testate in 1882, and by his will devised the land in question to his wife Elizabeth for her life, and at her death to his son Thomas L. Lacy, a plaintiff in this case. On the twenty-fourth of February, 1883, Thomas L. Lacy and. his mother made a mortgage upon the land to James G-rubb to secure their note to him for $400 due in ¡September, 1884. Thereafter and on the seventeenth of April, 1883, Thomas L. Lacy and his wife and mother conveyed the land to Eliza…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sims v. EverhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Craig v. Van BebberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  3. Gillespie v. BaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Huth v. Carondelet Marine Railway & Dock Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  5. Thomas v. PullisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nelson v. BrowningSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. Lasoya Oil Co. v. ZulkeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Putnal v. WalkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  4. Yates v. Buffalo State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Van Horn v. PersingerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API