Legal Opinion

Perroni v. Farley

New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau

Decided January 7, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*87The attorneys for the respective parties prayed leave to submit briefs in behalf of the respective parties, petitioner and respondent, which prayer was granted, and snch briefs having been duly filed, and the referee aforesaid having been duly granted by the commissioner of labor additional time within which to determine said matter.

H« ❖ Hi Hi H< Hi

2. The proofs manifest that on the evening of May 1st, 1934, the respondent made an arrangement with the petitioner whereby the petitioner on the morning of the following day, May 2d, 1934, became an employe of the respondent, as a laborer, to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Forrester v. EckersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Surety Corp. v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Dawson v. Joe Chester Artificial Limb Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Gray v. GreenwoodPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API