Diggs v. Green
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. The plaintiff took out an order of seizure and sale against a lot of ground, which he had sold to the defendant. In the mean time, one James Wright had obtained a judgment by attachment against the defendant, with a privilege on the lot for repairs made, and work done on it. The lot was sold under the plaintiff’s order of seizure, and purchased in by him.
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. The plaintiff took out an order of seizure and sale against a lot of ground, which he had sold to the defendant. In the mean time, one James Wright had obtained a judgment by attachment against the defendant, with a privilege on the lot for repairs made, and work done on it. The lot was sold under the plaintiff’s order of seizure, and purchased in by him. After some time had elapsed, James Wright intervened and took a rule on the plaintiff and sheriff, to show cause why the amount of his demand, (four hundred and nine dollars and forty-one…
1Opinion of the CourtMorphy, J.
This case commenced by an order of seizure and sale-sued out by plaintiff, against a ¡piece of property he had sold to defendant. Before this proceeding took place, one J. Wright -had proceeded by attachment in the Parish-Court, against the defendant, a non-resident, and had obtained a judgment for four hundred and nine dollars and forty-one cents, with privilege on the property for work and labor done and.materials furnished, in making banquets and gutters in front of the lot. .’Some time after the sale of the property,-which was adjudicated to the plaintiff, Wright took a rule on the latter…
2Cited by3 opinions
- New Orleans Land Co. v. Southern States Fair-Pan-American Exposition Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- Sturges v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
- Brown v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848