Legal Opinion

Currie v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 12, 1989No. Docket No. 12446-86Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES E. and AKIKO S. CURRIE, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Currie v. Commissioner

Docket No. 12446-86.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1989-23; 1989 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 22; 56 T.C.M. (CCH) 1076; T.C.M. (RIA) 89023;

January 12, 1989.

Douglas Scott Maynard and Earle A. Sylva, II, for the petitioners.

William D. Reese, for the respondent.

FAY

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

FAY, Judge: This case is before us on petitioners' motion for reasonable litigation costs, filed January 4, 1988, pursuant to section 7430 1 and Rule 231. A hearing on this motion was held in San…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Sher v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  3. Leopold Z. Sher and Karen B. Sher v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Robert Randall Baker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  5. Baker v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API