Legal Opinion

In re Cherry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1922PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied, without costs; as the printed papers on appeal consist largely *857of irrelevant matter, disbursement for printing the record is disallowed, but disbursement for printing points is allowed. The ordinances of the village of Larehmont* are valid and a proper exercise of the police power of the State; they were passed pursuant to a valid grant of power contained in section 30 of the Village Law, as amended by chapter 464 of the Laws of 1921. † (Lincoln Trust Co. v. Williams Bldg. Corp., 229 N. Y. 313.) The fact that the ordinances were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lincoln Trust Co. v. Williams Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gold v. Bldg. Com. of Warren Boro.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. State Ex Rel. Manhein v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  3. Gramatan Hills Manor, Inc. v. ManganielloNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Haussman v. OatleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  5. Von der Heide v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API