Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Dickerson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

The complainants are the only children and heirs at law of Martin Taylor, who died in 1932. They assert title to a designated tract of land as the only heirs at law of their grandmother, Lousette Taylor, living at the date of their father’s death.

The land in issue was devised by the last will of Lousette Taylor, admitted to probate in 1907, to her son, Martin Taylor, “during his natural life, then to go to my heirs equally, or their heirs or assigns.”

Lousette Taylor, the testatrix, was survived by her son, complainants’ father, and by three daughters. The daughters died prior to the death of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bigley v. WatsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Forrest v. PorchTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Robinson v. BlankenshipTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Maynor v. VaughnTennessee Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burton v. KinneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Burdick v. GilpinTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Felts v. FeltsTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  4. C. B. Huggins, Iv, of the Estates of Camillus B. Huggins and Augusta M. Huggins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  5. Nicholson v. NicholsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API