Legal Opinion
Bauter v. Hanover Ins. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 1, 1991PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
247 N.J. Super. 94 (1991)
588 A.2d 870
ROBERT W. BAUTER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 16, 1990.
Decided April 1, 1991.
Before Judges DEIGHAN and A.M. STEIN.
Rochelle Gizinski argued the cause for appellant (Richard A. Amdur, P.C., attorney, Marguerite A. Maggs on the brief).
Evan L. Goldman argued the cause for respondent (Mezey, Mezey, Goldman & Zublatt, attorneys, Miriam R. Rubin on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by DEIGHAN, J.A.D.
Plaintiff Robert W. Bauter seeks to recover…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Longworth v. Van HoutenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Nikiper v. Motor Club of America Cos.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Tyler v. NJ Auto. Full Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Bateman v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 291, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 398 Government Employees Insurance Company v. Alexander Dizol, Special Administrator of the Estate of Kevin Tate Dizol, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. MotleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- French v. New Jersey School Board Ass'n Insurance GroupSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Bauter v. Hanover Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Government Employees Insurance v. DizolDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.