Legal Opinion

Kanaan v. El-Mallah

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 22, 2018No. 17–P–843Published

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant, Nasser El-Mallah, appeals from a Superior Court judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Mahir M. Kanaan, following a jury-waived trial. He contends that the plaintiff's claim for breach of contract is barred by the statute of limitations, G. L. c. 260, § 2. Discerning no error in the trial judge's legal or factual conclusions that the suit is not foreclosed by the statute of limitations, we affirm.

1. Standard of review. "In reviewing a matter where[ ] the trial judge was the finder of fact, the findings of fact ... are accepted unless they are clearly erroneous and we review the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Twin Fires Investment, LLC v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. Poznik v. Massachusetts Medical Professional Ins. Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Klairmont v. Gainsboro Restaurant, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  5. Evans v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API