Legal Opinion

Hyman v. Borock

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1967No. Appeal, 555PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

We are here concerned with an assumpsit action instituted on June 12, 1964, by Martin Hyman, trading as Martin Hyman Realty Company, against Joseph Borock and Ruth Borock, his wife, wherein the plaintiff sought to recover a commission of $1050.00 on the sale by defendants to Stephen J. Green and Zelda Green of premises at 661 Artwood Drive in the City of Philadelphia. On June 22, 1964, an action was instituted by Bernard Kievan to recover a commission on the same sale. The two actions were consolidated for trial and were ultimately tried, February 9, 1966, before Judge…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Com. of Pa. v. ClaneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Cowsill v. Vipond Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CannonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Brown, J. v. Halpern, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Fisler v. State System of Higher EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Sherman v. YoderCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Ciaffoni v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API