Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Judicial Discipline & Disability Commission v. Simes

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 5, 2009No. 09-443Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJim Hannah, Chief Justice

I concur in the majority’s conclusion that the findings of the Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission l^that Judge L.T. Simes violated Canons 4(E), 4(G), and 2 of the Cannons of Judicial Conduct are not clearly erroneous. However, I dissent from the majority’s decision to suspend Judge Simes. I believe that the Commission was correct in recommending that Judge Simes should be permanently removed from the bench. Maintaining public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary requires no lesser sanction.

The matter raised by the Commission is confined solely to Judge Simes’s conduct on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Judicial Discipline & Disability Commission v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Willis v. CrumblySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API