Legal Opinion
Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 9, 1983No. 1417, Docket 83-6093PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal is by the engineering firm of Lawler, Matusky & Skelly Engineers (LMS), consultants to the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Thomas P. Griesa, Judge, denying the firm’s motion for intervention of right under Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a)(2) or permissive intervention under Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(b)(2). Intervention is sought in connection with a pending trial on a motion for civil contempt against NYSDOT and the United States Army Corps of Engineers by LMS, which performed a 1979-80 study…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- 10 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1223, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,272 George Rios, and John Gunther, Applicants to Intervene-Appellants v. Enterprise Association Steamfitters Local Union 638 of U.A., United States of America (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission), and John Gunther, Applicants to Intervene-Appellants v. Enterprise Association Steamfitters Local Union 638 of U.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. The Regents Of The University Of The State Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps Of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
3Cited by2 opinions
- Francisco Pujol v. Shearson/american Express, Inc., Appeal of Ana Bonelli De PujolCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps Of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983