Reed v. Cromer
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBrowne, J.
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal, because it was made returnable on a date more than ninety days after the date of the filing and recording of the entry of appeal.
*391The appellants concede that ‘ ‘ it was inadvertently made returnable to the 5th day of July, A. D. 1923, a period of ninety-four days.”
It is strongly contended by the appellants, in an exhaustive and well reasoned brief, that this is a defect that can be waived by the appellee, under the circumstances shown by the record.
Writs of error and appeals in chancery are matters of right. Sections 2908 and 3167 Revised General…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Griffith v. HendersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- DeBogory v. HafleighSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ramagli Realty Co. v. CraverSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
- McJunkins v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Elder v. Estate of R. S. Hall, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Russom v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Sirman v. ConklinSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.