Legal Opinion

Kautzmann v. James

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 19, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEBRING, Justice.

This is the second appearance of the parties in this court.

As a predicate for the first appearance of the parties here, the appellant ICautz-mann filed a complaint in the court below in which he alleged, in substance, that he requested the defendant, a druggist, to fill two prescriptions for him, one for external use and the other for internal use; that the defendant negligently and carelessly switched the labels on the two bottles of medicine and plaintiff was thereby, caused to take internally a large bottle of medication prescribed for external use; that approximately…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Prall v. PrallSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  2. Cone v. Inter County Telephone Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1949
  3. Kroier v. KroierSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  4. Florida Southern Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  5. Tampa Electric Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stadler v. Cherry Hill Developers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. Hardee v. Gordon Thompson Chevrolet, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Hammac v. WindhamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  4. In Re Pellicer's EstateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  5. Bricklayers, Masons, Plasterers Union No. 3 v. Acme Tile & Terrazzo Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API