Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Gordon

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 23, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaniey, J.

Appellants brought separate actions against appellees, Gordon and Lucas, to recover from Gordon on a promissory note $1,907.65 and interest, and from Lucas $2,400 and interest, both notes being dated January 12, 1926, and given to the Bank of Morrilton in renewal of previous notes given to said bank in July, 1925, in payment for 40 shares each of said bank’s stock of the par value of $1,000'. In the case of Gordon $500 was paid to said bank in cash by check as part of the purchase price, and note given for $2,000, while in the case of Lucas no cash payment was made, and his note was for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank of Commerce v. GoolsbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  2. Bank of Dermott v. MeaselSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. Bank of Manila v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McNatt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  2. Fox v. Republic National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. National Oil Co. v. ReevesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  4. Thomas v. Arkansas State Fair Assn.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  5. Sitton v. CongletonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API