Legal Opinion · Dissent

Croker v. Boeing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 30, 1981No. Nos. 80-1569, 80-1570Published

1Dissent

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge, with whom Judges A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., and, SLOVITER join,

dissenting in part:

I join in Parts I, II, IV and V of the opinion of the court, but dissent from the holding in Part III that a plaintiff relying on 42 U.S.C. § 1981 must establish a racially discriminatory purpose by direct evidence rather than a racially disparate impact in order to make out a prima facie case. Judge Aldisert’s dissenting opinion makes the point that in interpreting an ambiguous statute judges should follow a “sound law” approach. It seems to me that the judges in the majority are doing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API