Legal Opinion

State v. Biedler

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided May 29, 1916No. 81PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In court in Banc.

1Opinion of the Court

Pennewill, C. J.,

Boyce, Conrad, Rice and Heisel, J. J., sitting.

Information in the nature of a quo warranto by the State of Delaware, upon the relation of Josiah 0. Wolcott, Attorney General, against Ashby Lee Biedler, Henry C. Dunlap, William J. Kehoe, Robert Y. Slater, Erasmus B. Waples, and Charles W. Slater, with afccpmpanying affidavits and exhibits presented to the court, asking for a rule upon the respondents to show cause why leave should not be granted to file the same. Rule granted. On motion to vacate service of rule to show cause. Granted as to Henry C. Dunlap, Robert Y. Slater,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Ames and Others v. State of Kansas Ex Rel. Johnston. Kansas Pac. Ry Co. v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Person v. . GrierNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Matthews v. . TuftsNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Parker v. . MarcoNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Liberty Morocco Co. v. RothSuperior Court of Delaware · 1922
  2. Northumberland Insurance Co. v. WolfsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API