Legal Opinion

United States v. Griggs

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided January 26, 2004No. ACM 34739PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*713OPINION OF THE COURT

STONE, Senior Judge.

A panel of officer members, sitting as a general court-martial, convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of two specifications of using ecstasy and two specifications of distributing ecstasy, in violation of Article 112a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. Consistent with his pleas, he was found guilty of using marijuana, also a violation of Article 112a, UCMJ. The adjudged and approved sentence included a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 150 days, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to the grade of E-l.

The appellant contends the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. OhrtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  5. United States v. ClaxtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. GriggsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  2. United States v. GriggsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  3. United States v. GriggsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API