Legal Opinion

State v. Berkman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1944No. 4053Published

1Opinion of the CourtCarpentee, J.

In the Municipal Court of Toledo, it was charged that on April 6, 1943, defendants “Sam Berkman & Jacob Berkman, did keep a room to be used for gambling at 248 Superior St., Toledo, 0., contrary to Section 13054, General Code.” On demand of defendants, trial by jury was had-in which the’ state sought to prove that the type of gambling charged was “numbers game.” The verdict was guilty and sentences were imposed which were affirmed by the Court of Common Pleas.

On appeal on questions of law, several assignments of error are presented.

1. On the voir dire, several prospective jurors stated that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. CardenOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  2. City of Toledo v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API