Legal Opinion

District Township of Pleasant Valley v. Calvin

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 13, 1882PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Fayette Circuit Court. Action upon a promissory note.' The defendant ~W. H. Harrington answered. There was a demurrer to the answer, which was sustained. The defendant failed to amend his answer. Judgment was rendered against him and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEothrock, J.

The note upon which suit is brought is in these words:

“$1,000. Clermont, June 7th, 1876.
“On demand after date for value received we promise to pay to the order of the District Treasurer of District Township of Pleasant Talley, One Thousand Dollars, with interest from date until paid at the rate of ten per cent, payable annually, and if interest is not paid when due to bear interest at same rates and terms. If sued I agree to pay expenses of collecting, including reasonable attorney fee.”

This note was signed by J. P. Calvin, and three other parties, one of whom was appellant.

The following,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Deming v. State ex rel. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Pike v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  3. Scotten v. State ex rel. SimontonIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Kinney v. McDermotSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  5. Gunderson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the General Assignment of Smyth, New York County Courts1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API