Rhoden v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert J. Gladwin, Judge.
Appellant Lee Rhoden appeals his conviction on charges of driving while intoxicated, first offense, and driving without a driver’s license. On appeal, he argues that he was not brought to trial within twelve months as required by Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 28.1 (2006). We find merit in the argument and reverse and dismiss.
Appellant was arrested on April 26, 2003, and, pursuant to Rule 28, he should have been brought to trial by April 26, 2004, if there were no excludable periods under Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 28.3 (2006). His trial in district…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miles v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Shaw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
- Zangerl v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Gondolfi v. ClingerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.