Maddox v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Judge.
Defendant Maddox appeals the grant of plaintiff Brown’s motion for partial summary judgment. Maddox asserts that the trial court’s failure to consider and review both of his two depositions was error.
The Supreme Court in General Motors Corp. v. Walker, 244 Ga. 191, 193 (259 SE2d 449) (1979), held: “A deposition need not be introduced in evidence in order to be considered in ruling upon a motion for summary judgment because the Civil Practice Act only requires that it be on ‘file.’ ... If a trial court indicates in his order granting a motion for summary judgment that the motion…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Yost v. TorokSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- General Motors Corp. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Anderson v. MatichCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bishop v. Mangal Bhai Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Taylor v. SchanderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Light v. Equitable Mortgage Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Maddox v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Dunlap v. First Rock Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.