Legal Opinion

Security Bank v. Chiapuzio

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 1987No. 85-712; CA A36872PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action on a promissory note and to foreclose its security interest in a vendor’s interest under a land sale contract, which had been assigned to it in 1982 by defendant Henry Bunnell, the original vendor, to secure payment of the note, which he had co-signed. Defendant Chiapuzio (defendant) purchased the encumbered vendor’s interest from Bunnell in 1984 and claims to own that interest free and clear of plaintiffs security interest to the extent that he gave value without knowledge of the prior encumbrance to plaintiff. The trial court granted plaintiffs motion for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Panushka v. PanushkaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. May v. EmersonOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Heider v. DietzOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Renard v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Braunstein v. TrottierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Security Bank v. ChiapuzioOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. McConnell v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API