Legal Opinion
Fillwock v. Brown & Root, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 12, 1982No. 5-368PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRISBAUM, Judge.
In this worker’s compensation suit appellants Brown & Root and Highlands Insurance Company claim the trial court erred in considering the testimony of a psychiatric expert who examined plaintiff, John Fill-wock, for the first time after the primary trial on the matter. Mr. Fillwock was in*459jured in a work-related accident on November 28, 1979 and filed suit in the Twenty-Ninth Judicial District Court for the Parish of St. John the Baptist against his employer Brown & Root, Inc. and its worker’s compensation carrier, Highlands Insurance Co. on October 14, 1980 after Mr.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shows v. WilliamsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Naquin v. Maryland Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Victoriana v. Orleans Parish Sch. Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Davenport v. McCullough Services Baroid Div.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Thomas v. McInnis Bros. Const., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ewell v. Schwegmann Giant Super MarketsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- Fillwock v. Brown & Root, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984