Lane Construction & Plumbing Co. v. Green
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
There is involved here for review an order of the State Industrial Court, sitting en banc, affirming an award of the trial court allowing the respondent, Hester K. Green, claimant below, compensation benefits under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Claimant will be referred to as claimant, the respondent Harrell O. Burns as respondent Burns or “Burns,” the respondent Lane Construction & Plumbing Supply Company as respondent Lane or “Lane,” this being the relationship the parties bore to each other in the trial court.
Respondent Lane on September 16, 1966, was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hollingsworth v. Crossett Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Domestic Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co. v. WestonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Herron Lumber Company v. HornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Dierks Forests, Inc. v. ParnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- United States Gypsum Company v. RauhSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilsey, Bennett Co. v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- McConnell v. Y.M.C.A. of Greater OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Wilsey, Bennett Co. v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Wilsey, Bennett Co. v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981