Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Nunez

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 12, 1943No. 36672PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

The plaintiff instituted a jactitation action against the defendants, alleging that he was the owner and in possession of a small tract of marsh or lowland and that .the defendants were slandering his title and trespassing upon his property. He prayed for a restraining order and a rule nisi for a preliminary writ -of injunction, to prevent trespassing pendente lite. The court entered an order accordingly.

The respondents, in their answer or return to the rule, denied that the plaintiff was the owner and in possession of the property and averred ownership in Adam Nunez,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Acosta v. NunezLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. BoudoinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Steller v. DavidSuperior Court of Delaware · 1969
  3. Day v. Department of InstitutionsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API