Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Solberg

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 15, 1992No. 26624-2-IPublished

1ConcurrencePekelis, J.

(concurring) — I concur in the result, but write separately because I do not agree that Solberg's arrest was unlawful. The majority does not dispute that there was probable cause to arrest Solberg, but because it contends that the arrest took place in his home, concludes that a warrant was required. I do not agree that the arrest here took place in Solberg's home.

It is undisputed that while the police officers were talking to Bowley on the porch, Solberg decided to come out and join them. It was not until Solberg exited the house and came out on the front porch that he was arrested. While in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HolemanWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. CarlowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API