Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kelly

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 8, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

The defendant was indicted jointly with one Bradley for assaulting one Julia Haverson and robbing her of the sum of $18 on December 8,1908, in the Dorchester District in Boston. Bradley was not on trial and was not used as a witness, and there was no evidence as to where he was at the time of the trial. The defendant was found guilty and the case is here on exceptions by him to the admission of certain evidence. We consider only those exceptions which have been argued, treating the others as waived.

1. One Auffray was called as a witness by the Commonwealth and was allowed to testify, against…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. McDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CorcoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  2. Commonwealth v. BoraskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API