Christopher N. Cratin v. Marshall Fisher
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CARLTON, J;,
CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART:
¶ 13. Cratin filed a grievance with the MDOC’s ARP alleging that he is entitled to receive earned time for his sex convictions. The MDOC subsequently rejected Cratin’s ARP grievance as untimely. Cra-tin then appealed the MDOC’s ARP decision to the circuit court. The circuit court entered an order of dismissal, stating that it was unsure whether it had jurisdiction over Cratin’s appeal. In that same order, the circuit court then addressed the merits of Cratin’s appeal and found that the MDOC’s policy prohibiting earned time to sex offenders…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stewart v. WallsMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Winfred Forkner v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2017