Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Christopher N. Cratin v. Marshall Fisher

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided December 12, 2017No. 2016-CP-00259-COAPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CARLTON, J;,

CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART:

¶ 13. Cratin filed a grievance with the MDOC’s ARP alleging that he is entitled to receive earned time for his sex convictions. The MDOC subsequently rejected Cratin’s ARP grievance as untimely. Cra-tin then appealed the MDOC’s ARP decision to the circuit court. The circuit court entered an order of dismissal, stating that it was unsure whether it had jurisdiction over Cratin’s appeal. In that same order, the circuit court then addressed the merits of Cratin’s appeal and found that the MDOC’s policy prohibiting earned time to sex offenders…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. WallsMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Winfred Forkner v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API